I write to warn all who read this of a growing problem that has permeated deep within several groups I associate with, namely those referred to as book reviewers, a.k.a. “the damn critics!”
As a writer of fiction, myself, I am known in some reviewing circles as being “easier” on new/young writers than some of my peers, and thus have been sought out by hundreds of authors for a gander at their work and an opinion thereof. However–as of late–even I have had to draw a rather thick line in the sand regarding reading and reviewing certain genres of fiction. The various fads/crazes circling any popular novel induce a strange marketing phenomena that those among my acquaintance have dubbed “copycat” novels. Twilight mimics have lessened as of late, though a trickle of such titles remain… like a draining wound in the side of a comatose publishing industry. Supernatural thrillers penned in the oh-poor-me First Person Perspective—which seems to have lost all its art lately—are so common that they’ve attained that awful title of Glut, to the point where I cringe at any sentence beginning with “I.”
The zombie “apocalypse” craze is the latest fad, though–thankfully–it appears to be on the wane. Each month nine to twelve new zombie novels pop up on the revered List of Titles sent ’round to us hopeful reviewers, successfully washing the whole genre a bit paler with each new addition. One may write a great piece of undead/re-dead fiction but it may well get lost in the throng of poorly-disguised copycats. The chance for being “discovered” in such company is next to nil.
Now, it seems–to myself and many of my fellow reviewers–that quite a number of today’s writers are inspired by nothing else than what others write about, or by the latest movie that they’ve seen. The prose penned by such writers reflects a noticeable lack of real creativity, thus rendering them hard to read… or say anything good about. After several of these tepidly plagiaristic novels in a row, it becomes a delicate business to even select a title in a certain genre, regardless of writer. There are only so many ways one can say “I wish I could get those hours of my life back.”
Perhaps the saddest result of all this is that the once-bright fire of curiosity–that little voice that says “it might be a great piece a literature”–begins to die away in the mind of a reviewer, even to the point where some refuse to review fiction at all… only selecting a title when one is recommended by a fellow reviewer whose already taken the plunge, so to speak.
In writing this I am fully aware that it sounds a bit stuffy, and that some folks may absolutely love to tear through such novels as I’ve described, one after another, gleefully reading to the last page and scampering off to hunt for more. Feel free to continue doing so, but don’t ask to me to read them. I write fiction, but read it only on a referral basis now… or if someone pays me good money to. The latter has happened much more frequently lately. It appears that more and more reviewers are rejecting books, sick of reading repeating mirror reflections of whatever novel has preceded it, and authors are having to pay to ensure that their book actually gets selected.
How can you avoid becoming bogged down in the marshy part of Lake Literature? Write what you know… write about something you’ve actually experienced and researched… write about a vivid dream you’ve had… write about folks facing dark odds but emerging victorious, and as wiser people. Write about everyday things, as well as the spectacular and far-fetched. Anyone whose ever read Austen’s Pride & Prejudice–and bothered to do a bit of historical research on it—knows how extraordinarily normal the circumstances of that book were, for the author… and yet it remains one of the best novels ever written.
I want to read great literature, books that stand out. If it disappears into a dozen other similar titles, I won’t see it. It’s not that I’m not looking, its that I’ve looked for a long, long time, and I’ve learned that great literature doesn’t follow a fad, or a craze. It is written because the writer must write it and in this it stands alone. Until I find such work, I’ll stay by my interesting standbys of natural science, history, computer software, photography, cooking and knitting, waiting for today’s Austen, today’s Forester and today’s Dumas to emerge from the mewling hordes of fad-beings and stand in the sunshine… waiting to be read, instead of merely hoping to be seen.

27 comments
Comments feed for this article
June 5, 2012 at 5:57 pm
Patricia Gligor
I enjoyed reading your post, Meredith. You made some good points.
June 5, 2012 at 6:28 pm
meredithgreenewriter
Thank you, Patricia for your kind reply. – MG
June 5, 2012 at 6:09 pm
Carolyn Eksteadt
Your review of ‘copycat’ books reminds me of that line in “LA Confidential” – “Hey, nothing too original. After all, this is Hollywood.” But essentially, you’ve hit the nail on the head. When a writer writes out of a need for money instead of a need to tell a story, we’re all left staring at a piece of paper that’s essentially a piece of money (low denomination, of course). But then, hasn’t that always been the case?
Btw, I don’t read modern fiction. The newest I read are Hemingway, Margaret Mitchell and F. Scott Fitzgerald. But the newest writers? I don’t go anywhere near them – they’re just no good.
My two cents.
Carolyn
June 5, 2012 at 6:27 pm
meredithgreenewriter
Carolyn thank you. ha “youngest” authors on my shelf are Nevil Shute, Gerald Durrell & C. S. Forester. It is nice to know that other writers feel as I do. – Meredith Greene
June 5, 2012 at 6:31 pm
Joan L. Cannon
Oh dear, Carolyn–though I’m in agreement with Meredith, I think you’re missing some really good stuff, even if it may fade out next to F. Scott Fitzgerald or Galsworthy. First I have to confess that I write fiction–non-genre fiction–which is to say, I sell virtually none of it. I’ve two novels available from Amazon and a collection of short stories, and none is “genre.” The editor I hired to help try to get my third novel into print tells me it’s “literary” and I would have said “mainstream.” The point I’m trying to make is that writing in genres takes the most creativity of all, in my opinion, and that’s why so much is pap or worse. I read fairly widely, and and I try never to close my mind automatically to a category, a style, a decade or a century, though it’s hard not to do that. Try some of the wonderful woman mystery writers whose novels are psychological art works: Elizabeth George, P. D. James; or Wallace Stegner, Anita Shreve…
June 5, 2012 at 6:18 pm
Lee Asbell
Last weekend I broke into hysterical laughter at the preview for a new movie entitled “Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter.” Your post is spot on.
June 5, 2012 at 6:26 pm
meredithgreenewriter
Thank you Lee. I also had that reaction to that particular title. As amusing as we find these things, the novels counterparts are nonetheless difficult to swallow. Thank you for the encouraging reply. – Meredith Greene
June 5, 2012 at 6:32 pm
Joan L. Cannon
I have to ask, Meredith: how does one get a review from you?
Joan
http://www.jlcannon.net
http://www.hilltopnotes.blogspot.com
June 5, 2012 at 8:22 pm
meredithgreenewriter
Joan, I’m under contract with 1776 Productions, who consequently runs some of the last printed publications for Book Review in the country, as well as the online review hub City Book Review
Submission details can be found on the website. Thank you,
Meredith Greene
June 5, 2012 at 11:35 pm
Caroline Gerardo
I thought Abe as Vampire hunter was wacky as well, but upon thinking deeper it goes to the nuttiest conspiracy theories…
June 5, 2012 at 7:06 pm
David Ivester
I couldn’t agree with your points more, and I don’t think you sound stuffy at all. The main thing we look for in publishing new authors and new titles, is an original storyline with original characters with whom the readers can connect.
Unfortunately, many new, and even seasoned fall into the trap of following a trend, not unlike bad fashion. Trends really should not apply to writing. Imagination and creativity (and a good editor) are the best ingredients.
I fear the next Amazon phenomenon will be something combining graphic erotica, with vampires, zombies, and moody teen heroines.
To the writer who says “nothing is original anymore,” I say if it’s NOT fresh and original, why would anyone want to read it? My sympathies to the poor reviewers who feel that they must force themselves to finish a bad book.
On the other hand, my sympathies go out to authors and publishers who have suffered annihilation at the hands of a reviewer who does not understand how to express constructive reviewer opinion. I suppose that if I can’t be constructive in a review, I prefer to take a pass. If a book is less than three out of five stars, it will die on it’s own.
Thank you for your rant! I love it!
david
June 5, 2012 at 8:24 pm
meredithgreenewriter
I appreciate your remarks more than I can say. Originality is indeed possible, if only a bit scarce. Thank you for taking time out of your day to read and comment.
June 5, 2012 at 7:27 pm
Catherine
Meredith, this post was a long time coming, very well stated, and I couldn’t agree more. It’s a shame that some budding authors feel the need to ‘trend’ on what’s already been overkilled.
June 5, 2012 at 7:51 pm
Carol Boshears
I have been saying the very same thing for a long time. I have not read any of these genre books. I am not interested at all. If you want good fantasy you have to turn to someone like Brian Sanderson. He’s the only one I’ve read in that genre.
I like different books, historical fiction, especially about ancient Egypt (Pauline Gedge). I am currently writing one.
Some of my ideas are real kookie, but at least they are original thoughts.
Thank you for saying what you did. It needed to be said!
Carol
June 5, 2012 at 9:18 pm
Margie Church
You know the 50 Shades phenomenon is going to cause the next craze of “beat me senseless, please, I love it.” Ugh. I heard Lindsay Lohan is going to portray Elizabeth Taylor in an upcoming movie. I think there’s no limit to how much we can twist or low we can go.
June 5, 2012 at 10:13 pm
Sondra Smith
When I saw the commercial for “Abraham Lincoln – Vampire Hunter” I told my husband, “there should be a law against such writing.” How dare someone do something like that to one of our Countries Presidents!” He was a great leader and helped form this country into what it is today. It is pure trash, and has no room in our house to read or view such a movie. Why would someone want to make a icon National leader into a horror monster? That is not writing and it belongs in the trash!
I realize it is freedom of press, but there should be limits to what an author does in respect of making Abraham Lincoln or any great leader into a Vampire! That is total disrespect for our great leaders.
My question is…what is this world coming to? We are allowing this to happen. Rejection to such material would stop it. What is in Vogue at the moment needs to change. I vote to change it now!
June 6, 2012 at 5:59 pm
Darlene Jones
You should take a look at my books. They are unique, original stories – no copy catting here. http://www.emandyves.com
June 6, 2012 at 9:34 pm
meredithgreenewriter
You’ve got guts, posting your link after a piece like that… a figurative “En Guarde!”
June 6, 2012 at 6:32 pm
P.I. Barrington
Huh, my problem is that I’m not following trends. There’s just as much frustration in that. Good points.
June 7, 2012 at 8:38 pm
Chuck
Could be your software but I think you meant “who’s” (who has), not “whose” in two sentences of your largely on-target rant (though I don’t completely agree on Abe Lincoln/Vampire Hunter – sure, it’s not Caro’s latest LBJ bio but 1) it was published 2 years ago, following the author’s earlier Jane Austen zombie mix, so not a copy cat like current attempts in this genre and 2) mashing together disparate elements can create an interesting hybrid that’s fun to read.
June 8, 2012 at 2:13 am
Mary Foster
You have so many great point’s , I have written many novel’s under ghost names, none that I can share…And now have a great many mini stories out .
But the one that bothers me the most are fact not fiction at all.
I am having a problem with what people want to see and read.
What do I care,Personally I dont.
But I do want them to know that these thing’s do happen!
Can you give me some advice on how to get people back to earth ?
Thank’s,
Author Mary Foster
June 8, 2012 at 10:26 am
MonicaFairview
I definitely agree that there’s a problem with the copycat phenomenon, but it’s not necessarily the fault of the writers. The publishing industry wants to make the best of a trend, because it minimizes risk. People buy books based on the latest movie or latest best-seller. Writers who write according to the trend are more likely to get published. And so a vicious cycle is created, which leads to people publishing e-books that fit the trend, people buying them, and therefore everyone’s convinced that what the publishers want, which convinces the publishers that that’s what they need to publish.
Writing what you know has always been good advice, but the way the market is right now, it isn’t always enough to write a good book if it can’t be marketed and placed in the right category.
June 10, 2012 at 8:28 pm
A Reviewer’s Rant « Inspiring articles, blogs and prompts
[...] This blog is reposted from Greene Ink (http://www.belatorbooks.com).To view the original post, clink on the link below. (http://www.belatorbooks.com/greeneink/?p=922) [...]
June 14, 2012 at 2:39 pm
Rebecca Downey
I like you! Thanks. I’m no Hemingway, although my husband threatens to buy me a desk where I must stand up to type. When I finished my first novel, I was aghast at all of the genres, and had no idea the industry had such a large and bulging thirst for blood. I finally found a place in what they call “Fantasy” but the thriller is based on a very real and pressing struggle that children in third world countries face. The novel will be published next year, and perhaps at that time I’ll have the privilege of your review. Thanks again.
June 17, 2012 at 6:28 am
Karoliina
Hello, Ms Greene!
I can say I am certainly glad that novels that portray undead and monsters as lovers and “the good guys” are finally dying out – it’s been a rather irritating trend, both the watery novel and the precious space it and its kin were taking up in the bookstore.
Albeit, I’ve been thinking – what if one writes about vampires as the old-fashioned monsters? What if they don’t suck blood but drain life with their ‘touch of death’? What if they aren’t immortal, and must drain life from humans every now and then, otherwise they crumble to ash? That sort of thing.
How does a slightly more original approach to dark fantasy appeal to you?
- Liina
June 17, 2012 at 7:10 pm
Bobby
Well Meredith I don’t know much about President Lincoln and Vampires but I do know President Obama has decreed him to be his Mirror-Image in all he does. Although I read more books then anyone in the great state of California, I have never reviewed a book–due to my lack of reviewer capabilities and in-depth discernment on any subject at hand—That’s why we need people like you as to say it right….Adios
June 23, 2012 at 5:26 pm
Sharon
Excellent post. Thanks for your insightful comments.